Past 10 cigarettes a day, GBR implants lose twice the bone
Song YB, Park JW
Source study: Effect of smoking intensity on clinical outcomes of implants placed with simultaneous guided bone regeneration: a 5-year retrospective study. — Journal of oral science
In brief
- •In this 5-year cohort, smokers of >10 cigarettes/day lost about twice the marginal bone (2.67 mm) of non- and light smokers (1.34-1.40 mm).
- •Implant survival stayed at 100% up to 10 cigarettes/day but dropped to 88.1% above that threshold.
- •On multivariate analysis, ≥20 cigarettes/day (OR 16.7) and non-resorbable membranes (OR 10.4) were the leading independent failure risks.
How much does smoking actually cost an implant placed with simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR)? This 5-year retrospective cohort followed 55 patients (130 implants), stratified by smoking intensity around thresholds of 10 and 20 cigarettes/day. Marginal bone loss (MBL) was measured radiographically, and survival analysed with Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate logistic regression.
At 5 years the gradient was steep and dose-dependent. Patients smoking more than 10 cigarettes/day lost roughly twice the marginal bone of non-smokers and light smokers (2.67 mm vs 1.34-1.40 mm; P < 0.001), and heavy smokers (>20/day) lost the most (2.88 mm). Implant survival held at 100% for non-smokers and light smokers (≤10/day) but fell to 88.1% above that threshold. On multivariate analysis, smoking ≥20 cigarettes/day (odds ratio 16.7) and the use of non-resorbable membranes (odds ratio 10.4) emerged as the dominant independent risk factors for failure.
For clinicians, the value lies in the threshold: 10 cigarettes/day behaves as a clinical inflection point for GBR-supported implants, not a smooth continuum. The membrane signal is equally practical — in this cohort the non-resorbable membrane carried a substantial independent failure risk, a variable that belongs in the planning conversation alongside the patient's smoking habit. As a single-centre retrospective study the findings are associative, not causal, but the magnitude of the effect is hard to ignore.
Why it matters in practice
When planning an implant with simultaneous GBR, smoking intensity should be quantified, not just noted: the 10-cigarettes/day mark behaves as a clinical watershed, and membrane choice enters the same risk calculation.
Related articles
- International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgeryImplants at 20 years: a 93% survival rate — but half of failures are mechanical, not biological
- BMC oral healthDentine vs e-PRF for GBR: equivalent outcomes, your choice
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related ResearchOne-piece vs. two-piece implants at 15+ years: better bone, but at what cost?
- International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryAugmented vs native posterior mandible: which bone hosts healthier implants at 15 years?