Peri-implantitis surgery: submerged or not matters less than the patient in front of you

Source study: Surgical Reconstructive Therapy of Peri-Implantitis via Submerged Versus Non-Submerged Healing: A 2-Year Retrospective Study.Clinical implant dentistry and related research

In brief

  • 2-year retrospective study, 33 patients and 53 implants treated with reconstructive surgery for peri-implantitis
  • Clinical success was comparable between submerged and non-submerged healing
  • Submerged healing gave less pain and higher patient-reported satisfaction/esthetics
  • History of periodontitis and deeper baseline pockets predict worse outcomes regardless of technique

Reconstructive surgery is a common approach to peri-implantitis, but clinicians still debate whether covering the graft with a submerged healing approach offers real advantages over a non-submerged (open) approach. This retrospective study compared both modalities over 2 years, including their relative cost-effectiveness.

The authors analyzed records of 33 patients (53 implants) treated for peri-implantitis with reconstructive surgery, using either submerged or non-submerged healing, combined with grafting alone or grafting plus a collagen membrane. Treatment success was defined by a composite of absence of suppuration, minimal or no bleeding on probing, probing depth reduction, no additional marginal bone loss, and limited mucosal recession. Clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded, alongside a cost-effectiveness analysis by treatment-cost category.

Overall treatment success did not differ significantly between submerged and non-submerged healing, though the submerged approach trended toward higher success across follow-up. Both approaches produced significant improvements in plaque index, bleeding on probing, probing depth, and suppuration over time. Patient-reported outcomes favored the submerged group, with less pain/discomfort and higher esthetic and satisfaction scores. A history of periodontitis and a greater baseline probing depth independently predicted worse outcomes at 2 years, regardless of technique.

Clinical relevance: for practical purposes, submerged and non-submerged healing achieve comparable clinical success in peri-implantitis reconstructive surgery — so the choice can reasonably be guided by patient comfort and esthetics, where submerged healing has a documented edge, rather than by an assumption that one technique is clinically superior. The stronger predictors of failure were patient-related — a periodontitis history and deeper baseline pockets — a reminder that case selection matters as much as surgical technique.

Why it matters in practice

Suggests the choice between submerged and non-submerged healing can be guided by patient comfort/esthetics, while clinical attention should focus mainly on case selection (periodontitis history, baseline depth).

This summary is automatically generated from the original abstract and curated by Dr. Ernesto Bruschi. Always refer to the original publication for clinical decisions.