Suture-free flap closure: less keratinised mucosa lost at 6 months
Source study: Dimensional Changes of the Peri-Implant Mucosa Applying a Suture-Free Wound Closure Using a Healing Abutment Attachment: A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial. — Journal of clinical periodontology
In brief
- In 30 patients (posterior sites), a healing abutment attachment reduced buccal keratinised mucosa loss: −0.46 mm vs −1.23 mm with sutures.
- Supracrestal tissue height increased more without sutures (0.95 vs 0.59 mm at 6 months).
- Flap stabilisation took about 44 seconds instead of nearly 200.
- Small sample and 6-month follow-up: no data on marginal bone or long-term peri-implant health.
Closing the flap around a freshly placed implant is one of the most repetitive gestures in implant surgery, and one of the least questioned. Sutures hold the tissue, but they take time, and the way the flap is stabilised may influence how much keratinised mucosa survives healing. This randomised controlled trial from Yonsei University, with co-authors from the University of Zurich, asked whether a suture-free alternative — a healing abutment attachment (HAA) that stabilises the flap directly on the healing abutment — changes peri-implant soft-tissue dimensions compared with conventional suturing.
Thirty patients receiving implants in posterior maxillary and mandibular sites were randomly allocated to the HAA group (15 patients, 20 implants) or the suture group (15 patients, 15 implants). The investigators recorded keratinised tissue width (KTW), buccal supracrestal tissue height (STH) and the time needed to stabilise the flap, during surgery and over a 6-month follow-up.
Keratinised tissue shrank in both groups, but less with the attachment: at implant level, KTW decreased by 0.46 ± 0.71 mm in the HAA group versus 1.23 ± 0.95 mm with sutures, a statistically significant difference. Supracrestal tissue height increased in both groups over six months, more in the HAA group (0.95 ± 0.47 mm vs 0.59 ± 0.67 mm; p < 0.05). Flap stabilisation took about 44 seconds with the attachment versus nearly 200 seconds with sutures.
The clinical message is practical and modest in scale. In this small sample, at six months, suture-free closure saved chair time and preserved on average roughly three quarters of a millimetre more buccal keratinised mucosa. That margin matters most where the keratinised band is already borderline. The limits are equally clear: 30 patients, posterior sites only, unequal implant numbers per arm, and a follow-up that says nothing about long-term stability, marginal bone or peri-implant health. The device is a technical refinement worth watching, not yet a new standard.
Why it matters in practice
Where the keratinised band is already borderline, a few tenths of a millimetre preserved can matter; the finding still needs larger samples and longer follow-up.
Related articles
- Journal of periodontologySoft tissue at implants: autografts still lead, substitutes hurt less
- Clinical implant dentistry and related researchHorizontal ridge augmentation: tunneling holds its own against the flap
- Journal of periodontal & implant scienceKeratinized mucosa, not vestibule depth, protects peri-implant tissue
- Journal of periodontal & implant scienceNonsurgical EMD matched surgery for intrabony defects in this RCT