Dual fixation for FGG in the posterior mandible: 17% shrinkage and no complications at 12 months
Yang L, Wang X, Li C, Mao D, Bao R, Guan X, Li J, Guo Z
Source study: A Novel Dual Anchoring Technique for Keratinized Tissue Augmentation in Posterior Mandible: A Retrospective Case Series. — International dental journal
In brief
- •In this retrospective series (49 sites), a dual fixation system combining orthodontic anchor screws and membrane tacks reduced FGG shrinkage to ~17.5% at 12 months.
- •Mean net KTW gain was 8.02 mm; 85% of total contraction occurred within the first three months, underscoring the importance of early mechanical stability.
- •No intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded; VAS pain scores were negligible by day 14.
- •Limitations: retrospective design, no control group — prospective comparative data are needed before broader adoption.
Achieving adequate keratinized tissue width (KTW) around implants in the posterior mandible remains one of the more demanding soft tissue challenges in implantology. The free gingival graft (FGG) is the gold standard for KTW augmentation, yet graft contraction — particularly in a region subject to muscular pull and limited access — can significantly undermine the final result. This retrospective case series by Yang et al. introduces a Dual Anchoring Technique (DAT) designed to mechanically stabilize the graft during the critical healing phase, thereby reducing shrinkage and improving dimensional predictability.
The study enrolled 25 systemically healthy patients (49 implant sites) presenting with KTW less than 2 mm following bone augmentation procedures. The DAT combines two fixation elements: orthodontic anchor screws, placed at the coronal margin of the graft to prevent apical displacement, and membrane tacks, used to secure the graft body against the periosteum. This dual fixation system addresses the main vector forces responsible for graft migration and contraction in the posterior mandible. The primary outcome was KTW change from baseline (T₀) to 12 months (T₅). Secondary outcomes included graft shrinkage rate, operative time, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures via VAS scores.
Results were clinically compelling. Mean KTW increased from 0.67 ± 0.12 mm at baseline to 11.00 ± 0.87 mm at one month, stabilizing at 8.70 ± 0.84 mm at 12 months — a net gain of 8.02 ± 0.82 mm (p < .001). Graft shrinkage at 12 months averaged 17.48 ± 3.41%, with 85% of total contraction occurring within the first three months. Operative times were efficient: 26.40 ± 1.90 min for single-site procedures and 33.31 ± 2.08 min for two-site cases. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded, and VAS pain scores reached negligible levels by day 14, suggesting good patient tolerance.
The shrinkage rate of approximately 17.5% compares favorably with figures reported in the literature for conventional FGG techniques, which typically range from 25% to over 40% depending on the fixation method and site. The near-complete contraction within the first three months reinforces the importance of early mechanical stabilization — precisely the window in which the DAT exerts its greatest mechanical influence.
For the practicing periodontist or implantologist, the take-home message is straightforward: in the posterior mandible, where anatomy and muscular dynamics conspire against graft stability, a dual fixation strategy using readily available hardware can meaningfully improve outcomes. The technique is reproducible, time-efficient, and associated with low morbidity. Limitations inherent to the retrospective design and the absence of a control group warrant cautious interpretation, but the consistency of results across 49 sites over 12 months provides a credible foundation for prospective investigation.
Why it matters in practice
The posterior mandible is the most demanding site for FGG due to muscular pull and limited access; if the shrinkage reduction reported in this cohort is confirmed prospectively, a dual fixation approach using readily available hardware could become a practical adjunct to the standard technique for implant sites with minimal keratinized tissue.
Related articles
- Head & face medicineFree gingival graft donor site: CTA alone shortens closure time and reduces mid-healing pain
- BioinformationFGG vs. collagen matrix for peri-implant keratinized tissue: autograft wins at 6 months
- International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryAugmented vs native posterior mandible: which bone hosts healthier implants at 15 years?
- BMC oral healthDentine vs e-PRF for GBR: equivalent outcomes, your choice